Trials of War Criminals before the Nuernberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10
Volume I
Free

Trials of War Criminals before the Nuernberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10 Volume I

By Various
Free
Book Description
Table of Contents
  • PREFACE
  • CONTENTS
  • TRIALS OF WAR CRIMINALS BEFORE NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNALS
  • DECLARATION ON GERMAN ATROCITIES
  • EXECUTIVE ORDER 9547
  • LONDON AGREEMENT OF 8 AUGUST 1945
  • CHARTER OF THE INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL
    • I. CONSTITUTION OF THE INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL
      • II. JURISDICTION AND GENERAL PRINCIPLES
      • III. COMMITTEE FOR THE INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION OF MAJOR WAR CRIMINALS
      • IV. FAIR TRIAL FOR DEFENDANTS
      • V. POWERS OF THE TRIBUNAL AND CONDUCT OF THE TRIAL
      • VI. JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE
      • VII. EXPENSES
      • PROTOCOL
  • CONTROL COUNCIL LAW NO. 10
    • PUNISHMENT OF PERSONS GUILTY OF WAR CRIMES, CRIMES AGAINST PEACE AND AGAINST HUMANITY
      • Article I
      • Article II
      • Article III
      • Article IV
      • Article V
  • EXECUTIVE ORDER 9679
  • HEADQUARTERS
  • MILITARY GOVERNMENT—GERMANY UNITED STATES ZONE ORDINANCE NO. 7
    • Article I
      • Article II
      • Article III
      • Article IV
      • Article V
      • Article VI
      • Article VII
      • Article VIII
      • Article IX
      • Article X
      • Article XI
      • Article XII
      • Article XIII
      • Article XIV
      • Article XV
      • Article XVI
      • Article XVII
      • Article XVIII
      • Article XIX
      • Article XX
      • Article XXI
      • Article XXII
      • Article XXIII
  • MILITARY GOVERNMENT—GERMANY ORDINANCE NO. 11
    • Article I
      • Article II
      • Article III
  • OFFICIALS OF THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY GENERAL
  • INTRODUCTION
  • ORDER CONSTITUTING TRIBUNAL I
  • MEMBERS OF THE TRIBUNAL
  • PROSECUTION COUNSEL
  • DEFENSE COUNSEL
  • I. INDICTMENT
    • COUNT ONE—THE COMMON DESIGN OR CONSPIRACY
      • COUNT TWO—WAR CRIMES
      • COUNT THREE—CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY
      • COUNT FOUR—MEMBERSHIP IN CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION
  • II. ARRAIGNMENT
  • III. STATEMENT OF THE TRIBUNAL ON THE ORDER OF TRIAL AND RULES OF PROCEDURE, 9 DECEMBER 1946[6]
  • IV. OPENING STATEMENT OF THE PROSECUTION BY BRIGADIER GENERAL TELFORD TAYLOR, 9 DECEMBER 1946.[7]
    • STATE MEDICAL SERVICES OF THE THIRD REICH
      • CRIMES COMMITTED IN THE GUISE OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH
      • A. High-Altitude Experiments
      • B. Freezing Experiments
      • C. Malaria Experiments
      • D. Mustard Gas Experiments
        • E. and F. Ravensbrueck Experiments Concerning Sulfanilamide and Other Drugs; Bone, Muscle, and Nerve Regeneration and Bone Transplantation
      • G. Sea-Water Experiments
      • H. Epidemic Jaundice
      • I. Sterilization Experiments
      • J. Typhus (Fleckfieber) and Related Experiments
      • K. Poison Experiments
      • L. Incendiary Bomb Experiments
      • M. Jewish Skeleton Collection
        • GERMAN MEDICAL ORGANIZATION Before 1933
      • Immediate Impact of Nazism on German Medicine
      • Prostitution of German Medicine Under National Socialism
      • Medical School and Medical Training Under the Nazis
      • Summary
        • CRIMES OF MASS EXTERMINATION; MURDER OF POLISH NATIONALS
      • EUTHANASIA
      • SUMMARY
  • V. INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT ON THE PRESENTATION OF EVIDENCE MADE BY THE PROSECUTION, 10 DECEMBER 1946[13]
  • VI. ORGANIZATION OF THE GERMAN MEDICAL SERVICES
    • a. Introduction
      • b. Evidence
        • FUEHRER DECREE, 28 JULY 1942, CONCERNING THE MEDICAL AND HEALTH SERVICES
        • 1942 REICHSGESETZBLATT, PART 1, PAGE 515
        • Fuehrer Decree of 28 July 1942, Concerning the Medical and Health Services
        • SECOND FUEHRER DECREE, 5 SEPTEMBER 1943, CONCERNING THE MEDICAL AND HEALTH SERVICES
        • 1943 REICHSGESETZBLATT, PART 1, PAGE 533
        • Second Fuehrer Decree of 5 September 1943, Concerning the Medical and Health Services
        • FUEHRER DECREE, 25 AUGUST 1944, CONCERNING THE APPOINTMENT OF A REICH COMMISSIONER FOR MEDICAL AND HEALTH SERVICES
        • 1944 REICHSGESETZBLATT, PART 1, PAGE 185
        • Fuehrer Decree of 25 August 1944, Concerning the Appointment of a Reich Commissioner for Medical and Health Services
        • FUEHRER DECREE OF 7 AUGUST 1944, CONCERNING THE REORGANIZATION OF THE MEDICAL SERVICES OF THE WEHRMACHT
        • I Subordination and Powers
        • II Duties
        • III Special Powers
        • TABLE OF ORGANIZATION OF THE “AHNENERBE” FROM THE FILES OF THE AHNENERBE SOCIETY
        • “THE AHNENERBE”
        • LETTER FROM HIMMLER TO SIEVERS, 7 JULY 1942, CONCERNING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN “INSTITUTE FOR MILITARY SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH” WITHIN THE AHNENERBE SOCIETY
        • FUEHRER DECREE, 9 JUNE 1942, CONCERNING THE REICH RESEARCH COUNCIL
        • 1942 REICHSGESETZBLATT, PART 1, PAGE 389
        • Fuehrer Decree of 9 June 1942 Concerning the Reich Research Council
  • VII. EXTRACTS FROM ARGUMENTATION AND EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION AND DEFENSE
    • A. Medical Experiments
      • 1. HIGH-ALTITUDE EXPERIMENTS
        • a. Introduction
        • b. Selection From the Argumentation of the Prosecution
        • c. Selections From the Argumentation of the Defense
        • d. Evidence
        • LETTER FROM RASCHER TO HIMMLER, 15 MAY 1941, CONCERNING HIGH-ALTITUDE EXPERIMENTS ON HUMAN BEINGS
        • LETTER FROM RUDOLF BRANDT TO RASCHER, UNDATED, INFORMING HIM THAT PRISONERS WOULD BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR HIGH-ALTITUDE RESEARCH
        • LETTER FROM RUDOLF BRANDT TO SIEVERS, 21 MARCH 1942, CONCERNING RASCHER’S PARTICIPATION IN HIGH-ALTITUDE EXPERIMENTS
        • LETTER FROM RASCHER TO HIMMLER, 5 APRIL 1942, AND REPORT, UNDATED, ON HIGH-ALTITUDE EXPERIMENTS
        • FIRST INTERIM REPORT ON THE LOW-PRESSURE CHAMBER EXPERIMENTS IN THE CONCENTRATION CAMP OF DACHAU
        • LETTER FROM RUDOLF BRANDT TO RASCHER, 13 APRIL 1942, REGARDING HIS SUCCESS WITH HIGH-ALTITUDE EXPERIMENTS
        • LETTER FROM HIMMLER TO RASCHER, 13 APRIL 1942, REQUESTING A REPETITION OF HIGH-ALTITUDE EXPERIMENTS ON PRISONERS CONDEMNED TO DEATH
        • TELETYPE FROM RASCHER TO RUDOLF BRANDT, 20 OCTOBER 1942, REQUESTING CLARIFICATION ON THE PARDON GRANTED BY HIMMLER
        • TELETYPE FROM RUDOLF BRANDT TO SCHNITZLER, 21 OCTOBER 1942, CONCERNING THE PARDON GRANTED BY HIMMLER
        • LETTER FROM RASCHER TO HIMMLER, 16 APRIL 1942, REPORTING ON HIGH-ALTITUDE EXPERIMENTS WITH FATAL RESULTS AND ON EXPERIMENTS CONDUCTED TOGETHER WITH ROMBERG
        • FILE NOTE FOR SS OBERSTURMFUEHRER SCHNITZLER, 28 APRIL 1942
        • LETTER FROM RASCHER TO HIMMLER, 11 MAY 1942, AND SECRET REPORT CONCERNING HIGH-ALTITUDE EXPERIMENTS
        • LETTER, 29 SEPTEMBER 1942, AND REPORT, 28 JULY 1942, FROM ROMBERG AND RUFF TO HIMMLER CONCERNING EXPERIMENTS ON RESCUE FROM HIGH ALTITUDES
        • I. Introduction and Statement of the Problem
        • II. Procedure of the Experiment
        • III. Results of the Experiments
        • IV. Discussion of the Results
        • V. Conclusions from the Results
        • VI. Summary
        • Bibliography
        • LETTER FROM MILCH TO WOLFF, 20 MAY 1942, REGARDING CONTINUATION OF EXPERIMENTS
        • LETTER FROM MILCH TO HIMMLER, 31 AUGUST 1942, ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF REPORTS BY RASCHER AND ROMBERG ON HIGH-ALTITUDE EXPERIMENTS
        • LETTER FROM HIPPKE TO HIMMLER, 8 OCTOBER 1942, THANKING THE LATTER FOR HIS ASSISTANCE IN HIGH-ALTITUDE EXPERIMENTS IN DACHAU
        • NOTE BY ROMBERG ON SHOWING OF FILM IN OFFICE OF STATE SECRETARY MILCH, AND PROPOSED REPORT TO MILCH, 11 SEPTEMBER 1942
        • LETTER FROM RUDOLF BRANDT TO RASCHER, 13 DECEMBER 1942, AND HIMMLER’S ORDER ASSIGNING RASCHER TO HIGH-ALTITUDE EXPERIMENTS
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF TRIBUNAL WITNESS WALTER NEFF[25]
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT RUDOLF BRANDT[26]
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT ROMBERG[27]
      • 2. FREEZING EXPERIMENTS
        • a. Introduction
        • b. Selection from the Argumentation of the Prosecution
        • c. Selections from the Argumentation of the Defense
        • d. Evidence
        • LETTER FROM RASCHER TO HIMMLER, 10 SEPTEMBER 1942, TRANSMITTING INTERMEDIATE REPORT ON FREEZING EXPERIMENTS (1618-PS)
        • INTERMEDIATE REPORT, 10 SEPTEMBER 1942, ON INTENSE CHILLING EXPERIMENTS IN DACHAU CONCENTRATION CAMP
        • LETTER FROM HIMMLER TO RASCHER AND SIEVERS, 22 SEPTEMBER 1942, ORDERING REWARMING IN FREEZING EXPERIMENTS THROUGH PHYSICAL WARMTH
        • LETTER FROM RASCHER TO RUDOLF BRANDT, 3 OCTOBER 1942, STATING THAT SIEVERS WOULD OBTAIN FOUR GYPSY WOMEN FOR REWARMING THROUGH BODY WARMTH
        • TELETYPE FROM COMMANDANT OF DACHAU CONCENTRATION CAMP TO RUDOLF BRANDT, 7 OCTOBER 1942, STATING THAT FOUR WOMEN WOULD BE AVAILABLE FROM RAVENSBRUECK CONCENTRATION CAMP FOR RASCHER’S EXPERIMENTS
        • LETTER FROM GOERING’S OFFICE TO HIMMLER, 8 OCTOBER 1942, WITH ATTACHED INVITATION TO THE CONFERENCE ON “MEDICAL PROBLEMS ARISING FROM HARDSHIPS OF SEA AND WINTER”
        • LETTER FROM RASCHER TO HIMMLER, 16 OCTOBER 1942, TRANSMITTING REPORT ON COOLING EXPERIMENTS ON HUMAN BEINGS (NO-428)
        • REPORT OF 10 OCTOBER 1942, ON COOLING EXPERIMENTS ON HUMAN BEINGS
        • Behavior of the heart action under the influence of medication
        • LETTER FROM HIMMLER TO RASCHER, 24 OCTOBER 1942, AND NOTE BY RUDOLF BRANDT
        • MEMORANDUM OF RASCHER ON WOMEN USED FOR REWARMING IN FREEZING EXPERIMENTS, 5 NOVEMBER 1942
        • LETTER FROM SIEVERS TO BRANDT, 28 JANUARY 1943, AND RASCHER’S REPORT ON HIS DISCUSSIONS WITH GRAWITZ AND POPPENDICK
        • LETTER FROM RASCHER TO HIMMLER, 17 FEBRUARY 1943, AND SUMMARY OF EXPERIMENTS FOR REWARMING OF CHILLED HUMAN BEINGS BY ANIMAL WARMTH, 12 FEBRUARY 1943
        • Experiments for rewarming of intensely chilled human beings by animal warmth
        • LETTER FROM HIPPKE TO HIMMLER, 19 FEBRUARY 1943, ON FREEZING EXPERIMENTS IN DACHAU
        • LETTER FROM HIMMLER TO RASCHER, 26 FEBRUARY 1943, ON FREEZING EXPERIMENTS IN THE CONCENTRATION CAMPS AUSCHWITZ AND LUBLIN
        • LETTER FROM RASCHER TO RUDOLF BRANDT, 4 APRIL 1943, REPORTING ON DRY-FREEZING EXPERIMENTS IN DACHAU
        • LETTER FROM RASCHER TO KEINDL, 28 APRIL 1943, ABOUT PREVIOUS FREEZING EXPERIMENTS CONDUCTED AT SACHSENHAUSEN
        • LETTER FROM RASCHER TO SIEVERS, 17 MAY 1943, CONCERNING, A CONFERENCE WITH GEBHARDT ON FREEZING EXPERIMENTS
        • LETTER FROM RASCHER TO NEFF, 21 OCTOBER 1943, CONCERNING DRY-FREEZING EXPERIMENTS
        • LIST OF RESEARCH PROJECTS FROM THE FILES OF THE REICH RESEARCH COUNCIL
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF TRIBUNAL WITNESS WALTER NEFF[30]
      • EXTRACT FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT HANDLOSER[31]
      • EXTRACT FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT SCHROEDER[32]
      • EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT SIEVERS[33]
      • 3. MALARIA EXPERIMENTS
        • a. Introduction
        • b. Selections from the Argumentation of the Prosecution
        • EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT ROSE
        • EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT SIEVERS
        • c. Selections from the Argumentation of the Defense
        • EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT SIEVERS
        • EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT ROSE
        • d. Evidence
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE REVIEW OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE GENERAL MILITARY COURT IN THE CASE OF THE UNITED STATES VS. WEISS, RUPPERT, ET AL., HELD AT DACHAU, GERMANY
        • MILITARY GOVERNMENT COURT ORDER ON REVIEW
        • EXTRACTS FROM REPORT OF PROFESSOR DR. E. GILDEMEISTER CONCERNING THE ACTIVITIES OF THE ROBERT KOCH INSTITUTE—REICH INSTITUTE FOR THE FIGHT AGAINST INFECTIOUS DISEASES
        • AFFIDAVIT OF PROFESSOR DR. HANS LUXENBURGER, 24 MARCH 1947, CONCERNING ROSE’S INTEREST IN THERAPEUTICAL MALARIA TREATMENTS
        • EXTRACT FROM THE AFFIDAVIT OF PROFESSOR DR. ERNST GEORG NAUCK, M. D., HAMBURG 4, BERNHARD-NOCHT-INSTITUTE FOR NAUTICAL AND TROPICAL DISEASES
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF PROSECUTION WITNESS AUGUST H. VIEWEG[37]
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT ROSE[38]
      • 4. LOST (MUSTARD) GAS EXPERIMENTS
        • a. Introduction
        • b. Selections from the Argumentation of the Prosecution
        • EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT KARL BRANDT
        • EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT SIEVERS
        • c. Selections from the Argumentation of the Defense
        • EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT KARL BRANDT
        • EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT SIEVERS
        • d. Evidence
        • LETTER FROM SIEVERS TO RUDOLF BRANDT, 27 JUNE 1942, CONCERNING MUSTARD GAS AND ITS EFFECT ON HUMAN BEINGS
        • MEMORANDUM FROM SIEVERS TO RUDOLF BRANDT, 3 NOVEMBER 1942, CONCERNING RESEARCH IN THE NATZWEILER CONCENTRATION CAMP
        • LETTER FROM SIEVERS TO RUDOLF BRANDT, 22 APRIL 1943, REGARDING PREVENTION OF DR. WIMMER’S TRANSFER TO ACTIVE DUTY WITH THE AIR FORCE
        • REPORT BY HIRT AND WIMMER ON THE PROPOSED TREATMENT OF POISONING CAUSED BY LOST GAS
        • LETTER FROM GRAWITZ TO HIMMLER, 22 NOVEMBER 1944, REQUESTING PRISONERS FOR EXPERIMENTS
        • EXTRACT FROM REPORT ON MEDICAL EXPERIMENTS ADDRESSED TO KARL BRANDT
        • LETTER FROM SIEVERS TO GLUECKS, 11 SEPTEMBER 1942, CONCERNING MILITARY SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH WORK TO BE CONDUCTED AT NATZWEILER CONCENTRATION CAMP
        • AFFIDAVIT OF DR. WALTHER SCHIEBER ON HIS EFFORTS TO PURCHASE EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS IN SPAIN AND BRING THEM TO GERMANY
        • AFFIDAVIT OF DR. OTTO AMBROS,[39] 21 APRIL 1947, CONCERNING THE URGENCY OF EXPERIMENTS IN THE FIELD OF CHEMICAL WARFARE AGENTS AND THEIR COUNTERMEASURES
        • AFFIDAVIT OF DR. WALTER MIELENZ, 21 APRIL 1947, CONCERNING THE ASSIGNMENT OF KARL BRANDT IN CONNECTION WITH CHEMICAL WARFARE
      • 5. SULFANILAMIDE EXPERIMENTS
        • a. Introduction
        • b. Selection from the Argumentation of the Prosecution
        • EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT GEBHARDT
        • c. Selection from the Argumentation of the Defense
        • EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT GEBHARDT
        • d. Evidence
        • AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT FISCHER, 19 NOVEMBER 1946, CONCERNING SULFANILAMIDE EXPERIMENTS CONDUCTED IN THE CONCENTRATION CAMP RAVENSBRUECK
        • AFFIDAVIT OF THE DEFENDANT FISCHER, 21 OCTOBER 1946, SUPPLEMENTING HIS AFFIDAVIT CONCERNING SULFANILAMIDE EXPERIMENTS
        • EXTRACT FROM AFFIDAVIT OF DR. KARL FRIEDRICH BRUNNER, 14 MARCH 1947
        • EXTRACT FROM REPORT ON THE FIRST CONFERENCE EAST OF CONSULTING SPECIALISTS ON 18 AND 19 MAY 1942 AT THE MILITARY MEDICAL ACADEMY, BERLIN
        • EXTRACTS FROM REPORT ON THE THIRD CONFERENCE EAST OF CONSULTING SPECIALISTS ON 24 TO 26 MAY 1943 AT THE MILITARY MEDICAL ACADEMY, BERLIN
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF PROSECUTION WITNESS JADWIGA DZIDO[40]
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF THE PROSECUTION EXPERT WITNESS DR. LEO ALEXANDER[41]
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT GEBHARDT[42]
      • 6. BONE, MUSCLE AND NERVE REGENERATION AND BONE TRANSPLANTATION EXPERIMENTS
        • a. Introduction
        • b. Selection from the Argumentation of the Prosecution
        • EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT GEBHARDT
        • c. Selection from the Argumentation of the Defense
        • EXTRACT FROM THE FINAL PLEA FOR DEFENDANT GEBHARDT[43]
        • d. Evidence
        • AFFIDAVIT OF MRS. ZDENKA NEDVEDOVA-NEJEDLA, M. D., OF PRAGUE, CONCERNING EXPERIMENTAL OPERATIONS CONDUCTED ON FELLOW INMATES AT RAVENSBRUECK CONCENTRATION CAMP
        • AFFIDAVIT OF SOFIA MACZKA[44], 16 APRIL 1946, CONCERNING EXPERIMENTAL OPERATIONS ON INMATES OF THE RAVENSBRUECK CONCENTRATION CAMP
        • EXTRACT FROM “CLINIC AND PRACTICE”, WEEKLY JOURNAL FOR THE PRACTICING PHYSICIAN, REGARDING BONE TRANSPLANTATION
        • EXTRACTS FROM AFFIDAVIT OF DR. KARL FRIEDRICH BRUNNER, 14 MARCH 1943, CONCERNING SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENTS CONDUCTED AT THE CLINIC OF HOHENLYCHEN
        • EXTRACT FROM AFFIDAVIT OF DR. JOSE KOESTLER, 27 FEBRUARY 1947, CONCERNING DR. GEBHARDT’S ACTIVITIES
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF PROSECUTION WITNESS MISS KAROLEWSKA[45]
        • EXTRACT FROM THE TESTIMONY OF THE PROSECUTION EXPERT WITNESS DR. LEO ALEXANDER[46]
      • 7. SEA-WATER EXPERIMENTS
        • a. Introduction
        • b. Selection from the Argumentation of the Prosecution
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT SCHROEDER
        • c. Selections from the Argumentation of the Defense
        • EXTRACT FROM THE FINAL PLEA FOR DEFENDANT SCHROEDER[47]
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT BEIGLBOECK
        • d. Evidence
        • LETTER FROM THE TECHNICAL OFFICE OF THE REICH MINISTER OF AVIATION (GOERING) TO HIMMLER’S OFFICE, 15 MAY 1944, CONCERNING METHODS TO RENDER SEA WATER POTABLE
        • MINUTES OF CONFERENCE AT THE REICH MINISTRY OF AVIATION, 20 MAY 1944, CONCERNING METHODS FOR MAKING SEA WATER POTABLE
        • LETTER FROM SCHROEDER TO HIMMLER AND GRAWITZ, 7 JUNE 1944, REQUESTING SUBJECTS FOR SEA-WATER EXPERIMENTS
        • TELETYPE FROM RUDOLF BRANDT TO GRAWITZ, UNDATED, CONCERNING EXPERIMENTAL SUBJECTS
        • LETTER FROM SIEVERS TO GRAWITZ, 24 JULY 1944, CONCERNING EXPERIMENTS ON THE POTABILITY OF SEA WATER
        • PARTIAL TRANSLATION OF BECKER-FREYSENG DOCUMENT 42 BECKER-FREYSENG DEFENSE EXHIBIT 29
        • AFFIDAVIT OF DR. LUDWIG HARRIEHAUSEN, 9 JANUARY 1947, REGARDING USE OF PATIENTS IN SEA-WATER EXPERIMENTS
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF PROSECUTION WITNESS KARL HOELLENRAINER[51]
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT BEIGLBOECK[52]
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENSE EXPERT WITNESS DR. FRANZ VOLLHARDT[53]
      • 8. EPIDEMIC JAUNDICE EXPERIMENTS
        • a. Introduction
        • b. Selections from the Argumentation of the Prosecution
        • EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT HANDLOSER
        • EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT SCHROEDER
        • c. Selection from the Argumentation of the Defense
        • EXTRACT FROM THE FINAL PLEA FOR DEFENDANT HANDLOSER[54]
        • d. Evidence
        • AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RUDOLF BRANDT, 14 OCTOBER 1946, CONCERNING EXPERIMENTS TO DETERMINE THE CAUSE OF EPIDEMIC JAUNDICE
        • NOTE FROM HIMMLER TO GRAWITZ, 16 JUNE 1943, CONCERNING EPIDEMIC JAUNDICE EXPERIMENTS AT CONCENTRATION CAMP SACHSENHAUSEN
        • LETTER FROM HAAGEN TO SCHREIBER, 12 JUNE 1944, CONCERNING EPIDEMIC JAUNDICE EXPERIMENTS
        • COPY OF LETTER FROM HAAGEN TO GUTZEIT, 27 JUNE 1944, CONCERNING EPIDEMIC JAUNDICE EXPERIMENTS ON HUMAN BEINGS
        • EXTRACT FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT KARL BRANDT[56]
      • 9. TYPHUS AND OTHER VACCINE EXPERIMENTS
        • a. Introduction
        • b. Selections from the Argumentation of the Prosecution
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT MRUGOWSKY
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT SCHROEDER
        • c. Selections from the Argumentation of the Defense
        • EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT ROSE
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE FINAL PLEA FOR DEFENDANT MRUGOWSKY[59]
        • EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT MRUGOWSKY
        • d. Evidence
        • EXTRACT FROM THE AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT HOVEN, 24 OCTOBER 1946, CONCERNING TYPHUS AND VIRUS EXPERIMENTS
        • DIARY OF THE DIVISION FOR TYPHUS AND VIRUS RESEARCH AT THE INSTITUTE OF HYGIENE OF THE WAFFEN SS, 1941 TO 1945 (DING DIARY)
        • EXTRACT FROM THE AFFIDAVIT OF DR. ERWIN SCHULER, 20 JULY 1945, CONCERNING TYPHUS EXPERIMENTS
        • 1943 WORK REPORT FOR DEPARTMENT FOR TYPHUS AND VIRUS RESEARCH
        • LETTER FROM HAAGEN TO HIRT, 15 NOVEMBER 1943, CONCERNING PRISONERS TO BE USED AS EXPERIMENTAL SUBJECTS FOR TESTS WITH TYPHUS VACCINE
        • LETTER DICTATED BY ROSE, ADDRESSED TO HAAGEN, 13 DECEMBER 1943, CONCERNING EXPERIMENTAL SUBJECTS FOR VACCINE EXPERIMENTS
        • LETTER FROM HAAGEN TO HIRT, 9 MARCH 1944, CONCERNING EXPERIMENTS CONDUCTED WITH TYPHUS VACCINE AND REQUESTING EXPERIMENTAL SUBJECTS
        • LETTER FROM DR. GRUNSKE TO HAAGEN, 7 MARCH 1944, CONCERNING REPORTS ON YELLOW FEVER VIRUS EXPERIMENTS REQUESTED BY A JAPANESE MEDICAL OFFICER
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE AFFIDAVIT OF PROFESSOR OTTO LENZ, DIRECTOR OF THE ROBERT KOCH INSTITUTE IN BERLIN
        • EXTRACT FROM A CERTIFIED STATEMENT, 4 MARCH 1947, OF J. OERSKOV, M. D., DIRECTOR OF THE STATE SERUM INSTITUTE IN COPENHAGEN
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF PROSECUTION WITNESS EUGEN KOGON[63]
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT ROSE[64]
        • EXTRACT FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT MRUGOWSKY[65]
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENSE WITNESS DR. EUGEN HAAGEN[66]
      • 10. EXPERIMENTS WITH POISON
        • a. Introduction
        • b. Selection from the Argumentation of the Prosecution
        • EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT MRUGOWSKY
        • c. Selection from the Argumentation of the Defense
        • EXTRACT FROM THE FINAL PLEA FOR DEFENDANT MRUGOWSKY[68]
        • d. Evidence
        • REPORT FROM MRUGOWSKY TO THE CRIMINOLOGICAL INSTITUTE, 12 SEPTEMBER 1944, CONCERNING EXPERIMENTS WITH ACONITINE NITRATE PROJECTILES
        • Poison Projectile of a Russian 7.65 Caliber Pistol Cartridge
        • Russian 7.65 mm. Caliber Pistol Cartridge with Poison Projectile
        • EXTRACT FROM THE TESTIMONY OF PROSECUTION WITNESS DR. EUGEN KOGON[70]
      • 11. INCENDIARY BOMB EXPERIMENTS
        • a. Introduction
        • b. Selection From the Argumentation of the Prosecution
        • EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT POPPENDICK
        • c. Selection from the Argumentation of the Defense
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT POPPENDICK
        • d. Evidence
        • EXTRACTS FROM A REPORT ON THE FINDINGS OF 2 JANUARY 1944, ON A SKIN OINTMENT—R 17—FOR PHOSPHORUS BURNS
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE AFFIDAVIT OF UDO VON WOYRSCH, 3 MAY 1947, CONCERNING EXPERIMENTS ON COMBATING INJURIES DUE TO PHOSPHORUS INCENDIARY BOMBS
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF PROSECUTION WITNESS EUGEN KOGON[72]
        • EXTRACT FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT MRUGOWSKY[73]
      • 12. PHLEGMON EXPERIMENTS
        • a. Introduction
        • b. Selection from the Argumentation of the Prosecution
        • EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT GEBHARDT
        • c. Selection from the Argumentation of the Defense
        • EXTRACT FROM THE FINAL PLEA FOR DEFENDANT GEBHARDT[74]
        • d. Evidence
        • REPORT FROM GRAWITZ TO HIMMLER, 29 AUGUST 1942, CONCERNING EXPERIMENTS WITH BIOCHEMICAL REMEDIES CONDUCTED AT THE DACHAU AND AUSCHWITZ CONCENTRATION CAMPS
        • EXTRACTS OF LETTER FROM GRAWITZ TO HIMMLER, 7 SEPTEMBER 1942, AND REPORT ON GAS GANGRENE EXPERIMENTS
        • EXTRACT FROM THE TESTIMONY OF PROSECUTION WITNESS HEINRICH W. STOEHR[75]
        • EXTRACT FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT GEBHARDT[76]
      • 13. POLYGAL EXPERIMENTS
        • a. Introduction
        • b. Selection from the Argumentation of the Prosecution
        • EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT BLOME
        • c. Selection from the Argumentation of the Defense
        • EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT BLOME
        • d. Evidence
        • AFFIDAVIT OF FRITZ FRIEDRICH KARL RASCHER, M. D., 31 DECEMBER 1946, CONCERNING THE LIFE AND ACTIVITIES OF DR. SIGMUND RASCHER
        • REPORT FROM THE INSTITUTE FOR MILITARY SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, (DEPARTMENT DR. RASCHER) ON “POLYGAL 10”
        • MEMORANDUM BY SS OBERSTURMBANNFUEHRER WOLFF, 8 MAY 1944; LETTERS FROM DR. KAHR TO RASCHER, 10 AND 16 DECEMBER 1943
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT SIEVERS[79]
      • 14. GAS OEDEMA (PHENOL) EXPERIMENTS
        • a. Introduction
        • b. Selection from the Argumentation of the Prosecution
        • EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT MRUGOWSKY
        • d. Evidence
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE AFFIDAVIT OF WALDEMAR HOVEN, 24 OCTOBER 1946, CONCERNING THE KILLING OF INMATES BY PHENOL AND OTHER MEANS
        • EXTRACT FROM A SWORN STATEMENT BY DR. ERWIN SCHULER (DING), 20 JULY 1945, CONCERNING EUTHANASIA WITH PHENOL INJECTION
        • EXTRACTS FROM TESTIMONY OF THE DEFENDANT MRUGOWSKY[80]
      • 15. EXPERIMENTS FOR MASS STERILIZATION
        • a. Introduction
        • b. Selection from the Argumentation of the Prosecution
        • EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT RUDOLF BRANDT
        • c. Selection from the Argumentation of the Defense
        • EXTRACT FROM THE FINAL PLEA FOR DEFENDANT GEBHARDT[83]
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT POKORNY
        • d. Evidence
        • EXTRACTS FROM AFFIDAVIT OF KARL WILHELM FRIEDRICH TAUBOECK, 18 JUNE 1947, CONCERNING THE DEVELOPMENT OF, AND EXPERIMENTS WITH STERILIZATION DRUGS
        • LETTER FROM POKORNY TO HIMMLER, OCTOBER 1941, CONCERNING A STERILIZATION DRUG TO BE USED AGAINST GERMANY’S ENEMIES
        • LETTER FROM HIMMLER, 10 MARCH 1942, TO POHL (INITIALED BY RUDOLF BRANDT) CONCERNING A STERILIZATION DRUG AND SUGGESTING FURTHER RESEARCH ON CRIMINALS
        • LETTER FROM RUDOLF BRANDT TO POHL, JUNE 1942, TRANSMITTING AN INQUIRY BY HIMMLER AS TO THE PROGRESS MADE WITH EXPERIMENTS FOR MEDICAL STERILIZATION
        • LETTER FROM POHL TO HIMMLER, 3 JUNE 1942, CONCERNING THE DEVELOPMENT OF A STERILIZATION DRUG BY THE FIRM OF DR. MADAUS AND CO.
        • LETTER FROM RUDOLF BRANDT TO POHL, 11 JUNE 1942, ASKING HIM ON BEHALF OF HIMMLER TO SET UP A LARGE HOTHOUSE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A STERILIZATION DRUG
        • LETTER FROM GUND TO HIMMLER, 24 AUGUST 1942, CONCERNING RESEARCH IN MEDICAL STERILIZATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF STERILIZATION DRUGS
        • COVERING LETTER FROM BRACK TO HIMMLER, 28 MARCH 1941, WITH REPORT ON EXPERIMENTS CONCERNING STERILIZATION AND CASTRATION BY X-RAYS
        • LETTER FROM BRACK TO HIMMLER, 23 JUNE 1942, PROPOSING STERILIZATION OF TWO TO THREE MILLION JEWS
        • LETTER FROM HIMMLER (COUNTERSIGNED BY RUDOLF BRANDT), 11 AUGUST 1942, ADDRESSED TO BRACK, CONCERNING HIMMLER’S INTEREST IN STERILIZATION EXPERIMENTS
        • LETTER FROM BLANKENBURG TO HIMMLER, 29 APRIL 1944, REGARDING EMPLOYMENT OF DR. HORST SCHUMANN ON EXPERIMENTS CONCERNING THE INFLUENCE OF X-RAYS ON HUMAN GENITAL GLANDS IN CONNECTION WITH SIMILAR EXPERIMENTS CONDUCTED AT CONCENTRATION CAMP AUSCHWITZ
        • LETTER FROM PROFESSOR CLAUBERG TO HIMMLER, 30 MAY 1942 (REFERRING TO A LETTER FROM RUDOLF BRANDT), CONCERNING THE URGENCY OF RESEARCH INTO BIOLOGICAL PROPAGATION AND STERILIZATION WITHOUT OPERATION, AND DRAFT OF A “RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL PROPAGATION”
        • MEMORANDUM OF RUDOLF BRANDT, JULY 1942, ON A DISCUSSION BETWEEN HIMMLER, GEBHARDT, GLUECKS, AND CLAUBERG CONCERNING STERILIZATION EXPERIMENTS CONDUCTED ON JEWESSES
        • LETTER FROM RUDOLF BRANDT TO CLAUBERG, 10 JULY 1942, TRANSMITTING INSTRUCTIONS OF HIMMLER TO PERFORM STERILIZATIONS ON JEWESSES AT CONCENTRATION CAMP RAVENSBRUECK
        • LETTER FROM PROFESSOR CLAUBERG TO HIMMLER, 7 JUNE 1943, REPORTING ON RESEARCH IN CONNECTION WITH THE STERILIZATION OF WOMEN
        • EXTRACT FROM THE TESTIMONY OF THE DEFENDANT VIKTOR BRACK[84]
    • B. Jewish Skeleton Collection
      • a. Introduction
        • b. Selection from the Argumentation of the Prosecution
        • EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT SIEVERS
        • c. Selection from the Argumentation of the Defense
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT SIEVERS
        • d. Evidence
        • LETTER FROM SIEVERS TO RUDOLF BRANDT, 9 FEBRUARY 1942, AND REPORT BY HIRT CONCERNING THE ACQUISITION OF SKULLS OF JEWISH-BOLSHEVIK COMMISSARS
        • LETTER FROM SIEVERS TO RUDOLF BRANDT, 2 NOVEMBER 1942, REQUESTING WITH HIMMLER’S APPROVAL, 150 SKELETONS
        • LETTER FROM SIEVERS TO EICHMANN (COPY TO RUDOLF BRANDT), 21 JUNE 1943, CONCERNING SELECTION OF SUBJECTS FOR A SKELETON COLLECTION
        • EXTRACT FROM THE AFFIDAVIT OF DR. GISELA SCHMITZ, 27 MARCH 1947, ON SIEVERS’ POSITION IN THE AHNENERBE SOCIETY AND HIS CONNECTION WITH THE SKELETON COLLECTION
        • REGULATIONS FOR THE COMMANDOS (EINSATZKOMMANDOS)[87] OF THE SECURITY POLICE AND THE SECURITY SERVICE TO BE ACTIVATED IN STALAGS
        • EXTRACT FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT RUDOLF BRANDT[88]
    • C. Project To Kill Tubercular Polish Nationals
      • a. Introduction
        • b. Selection from the Argumentation of the Prosecution
        • EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT BLOME
        • c. Selection from the Argumentation of the Defense
        • EXTRACT FROM THE FINAL PLEA FOR THE DEFENDANT BLOME[90]
        • d. Evidence
        • LETTER FROM KOPPE TO RUDOLF BRANDT, 3 MAY 1942, CONCERNINGTHE KILLING OF TUBERCULAR POLES
        • LETTER FROM HIMMLER (SIGNED BY RUDOLF BRANDT) TO GREISER, 27 JUNE 1942, CONCERNING THE EXTERMINATION OF TUBERCULAR POLES
        • LETTER FROM BLOME TO GREISER, 18 NOVEMBER 1942, CONCERNING THE MASS EXTERMINATION OF TUBERCULAR POLES
        • AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RUDOLF BRANDT, 24 OCTOBER 1946, CONCERNING THE PLAN TO EXTERMINATE TUBERCULAR POLISH NATIONALS
        • LETTER FROM GREISER TO HIMMLER, 1 MAY 1942, CONCERNING THE PLAN FOR MASS EXTERMINATION OF TUBERCULAR POLES
        • EXTRACTS FROM A REPORT ON THE GERMAN TUBERCULOSIS CONFERENCE OF 18 TO 20 MARCH 1937, AT WIESBADEN
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE AFFIDAVIT OF DR. OSKAR GUNDERMANN, 28 DECEMBER 1946, STATING THAT BLOME OPPOSED THE PLAN TO EXTERMINATE TUBERCULAR POLES AND THAT THE PLAN WAS NEVER CARRIED OUT
        • EXTRACT FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT BLOME[91]
    • D. Euthanasia
      • a. Introduction
        • b. Selections from the Argumentation of the Prosecution
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST THE DEFENDANT KARL BRANDT
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT BRACK
        • c. Selections from the Argumentation of the Defense
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT KARL BRANDT
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE FINAL PLEA FOR THE DEFENDANT BRACK[108]
        • d. Evidence
        • EXTRACT FROM THE AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT BRACK, 14 OCTOBER 1946, DESCRIBING ADMINISTRATIVE DETAILS AND PROCEDURE OF THE EUTHANASIA PROGRAM
        • LETTER FROM DR. HILFRICH, BISHOP OF LIMBURG, TO THE REICH MINISTER OF JUSTICE, 13 AUGUST 1941, PROTESTING AGAINST THE KILLING OF MENTALLY ILL PEOPLE
        • EXTRACT FROM THE AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT HOVEN, 24 OCTOBER 1946, CONCERNING THE TRANSFER OF CONCENTRATION CAMP INMATES TO EUTHANASIA STATIONS FOR EXTERMINATION
        • LETTER FROM HITLER TO KARL BRANDT AND BOUHLER, 1 SEPTEMBER 1939, CHARGING THEM WITH THE EXECUTION OF EUTHANASIA
        • CONFIRMATION, 30 AUGUST 1940, OF THE TRANSFER OF MENTAL PATIENTS WITH LIST OF TRANSFERRED PATIENTS ATTACHED
        • LETTER FROM DR. CONTI TO THE MENTAL HOSPITAL IN KAUFBEUREN, 16 NOVEMBER 1939, REQUESTING THAT QUESTIONNAIRES (ATTACHED) BE FILLED OUT FOR INDIVIDUAL PATIENTS; LETTER FROM THE GENERAL SICK TRANSPORT COMPANY TO THE MENTAL HOSPITAL IN KAUFBEUREN, 12 MAY 1941, STATING THAT THE COMPANY WOULD REMOVE MENTAL PATIENTS; REPORT FROM THE PROVINCIAL ASSOCIATION FOR SOCIAL WELFARE IN SWABIA, 6 MAY 1941, THAT ALL TRANSFERRED PATIENTS HAD DIED; LETTER FROM GAUM, 24 NOVEMBER 1942, TO DR. LEINISCH STATING THAT EPILEPTICS WOULD BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH
        • EXTRACT FROM THE AFFIDAVIT OF DR. LUDWIG SPRAUER, 23 APRIL 1946, CONCERNING THE ORGANIZATION OF THE EUTHANASIA PROGRAM
        • LETTER FROM THE CHIEF OF THE INSTITUTION FOR FEEBLE-MINDED IN STETTEN TO DR. FRANK, 6 SEPTEMBER 1940, REQUESTING THAT EUTHANASIA BE CARRIED OUT ONLY AFTER LEGAL BASIS WAS CREATED
        • NOTE BY SELLMER, 6 DECEMBER 1940, DESCRIBING THE METHOD OF SELECTION FOR EUTHANASIA
        • LETTER FROM HIMMLER TO BRACK, 19 DECEMBER 1940, REQUESTING THAT EUTHANASIA STATION GRAFENECK BE DISCONTINUED AND THAT MOTION PICTURES BE SHOWN TO DISPEL RUMORS
        • LETTER FROM BRACK TO DR. SCHLEGELBERGER[112], 18 APRIL 1941, FORWARDING FORMS FOR EUTHANASIA AND SUGGESTING THAT DEATH NOTIFICATIONS SHOULD NOT FOLLOW A STEREOTYPED FORM
        • LETTER FROM HIRCHE, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE MENTAL INSTITUTION BERNBURG, TO CAMP COMMANDANT OF THE GROSS-ROSEN CONCENTRATION CAMP, 19 MARCH 1942, WITH LIST OF INMATES TRANSFERRED FROM THE CONCENTRATION CAMP TO BERNBURG
        • EXTRACT FROM LETTER FROM DR. FRITZ MENNECKE TO HIS WIFE, 25 NOVEMBER 1941, CONCERNING HIS ACTIVITIES AS PHYSICIAN SELECTING INMATES OF CONCENTRATION CAMP BUCHENWALD FOR EUTHANASIA
        • CIRCULAR FROM GLUECKS TO CONCENTRATION CAMP COMMANDANTS, 27 APRIL 1943, STATING THAT IN THE FUTURE ONLY INSANE PRISONERS SHOULD BE USED FOR ACTION “14 F 13” (EUTHANASIA)
        • DIRECTIVE OF THE REICH MINISTER OF THE INTERIOR, 6 SEPTEMBER 1944, ORDERING EUTHANASIA EXTENDED TO INSANE EASTERN WORKERS
        • EXTRACT FROM THE FIELD INTERROGATION OF KURT GERSTEIN, 26 APRIL 1945, DESCRIBING THE MASS GASSING OF JEWS AND OTHER “UNDESIRABLES”
        • UNSIGNED DRAFT LETTER FROM DR. WETZEL TO ROSENBERG, 25 OCTOBER 1941, DEALING WITH BRACK’S COLLABORATION IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF GAS CHAMBERS FOR THE EXTERMINATION OF JEWS
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE AFFIDAVIT OF DR. WERNER KIRCHERT, 29 JANUARY 1947, STATING THAT KARL BRANDT WAS NOT INVOLVED IN THE EUTHANASIA PROGRAM
        • AFFIDAVIT OF ALFRED RUEGGEBERG, 23 JANUARY 1947, CONCERNING RADIO DISCUSSIONS ON EUTHANASIA
        • AFFIDAVIT OF EDUARD WOERMANN, 18 JANUARY 1947. CONCERNING DISCUSSIONS OF KARL BRANDT AND PASTOR BODELSCHWINGH ON EUTHANASIA
        • AFFIDAVIT OF DR. HELMUTH WEESE, 19 MARCH 1947, CONCERNING USE OF CALADIUM SEGUINUM FOR STERILIZATION
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF PROSECUTION WITNESS DR. MENNECKE[114]
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT BRACK[115]
        • EXTRACT FROM THE TESTIMONY OF PROSECUTION WITNESS WALTER E. SCHMIDT[117]
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT KARL BRANDT[118]
    • E. Selections From Photographic Evidence of the Prosecution
  • VIII. EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENTS ON IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF THE CASE
    • A. Applicability of Control Council Law No. 10 to Offenses Against Germans During the War
      • a. Introduction
        • b. Selection from the Argumentation of the Prosecution
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE CLOSING STATEMENT OF THE PROSECUTION[121]
        • c. Selection from the Argumentation of the Defense
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT KARL BRANDT
    • B. Responsibility of Superiors for Acts of Subordinates
      • a. Introduction
        • b. Selection from the Argumentation of the Prosecution
        • EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING STATEMENT OF THE PROSECUTION[139]
        • c. Selections from the Argumentation of the Defense
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE FINAL PLEA FOR DEFENDANT KARL BRANDT[144]
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE FINAL PLEA FOR DEFENDANT SCHROEDER[145]
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE FINAL PLEA FOR DEFENDANT ROSTOCK[146]
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT HANDLOSER
        • EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT GENZKEN
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT BLOME
    • C. Responsibility of Subordinates for Acts Carried Out Under Superior Orders
      • a. Introduction
        • b. Selection from the Argumentation of the Prosecution
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE CLOSING STATEMENT OF THE PROSECUTION[149]
        • c. Selections from the Argumentation of the Defense
        • EXTRACT FROM THE FINAL PLEA FOR DEFENDANT BRACK[151]
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE FINAL PLEA FOR DEFENDANT FISCHER[154]
        • d. Evidence
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT KARL BRANDT[156]
        • EXTRACT FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT ROSE[157]
    • D. Status of Occupied Poland Under International Law
      • a. Introduction
        • b. Selection from the Argumentation of the Prosecution
        • EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING STATEMENT OF THE PROSECUTION[158]
        • c. Selection from the Argumentation of the Defense
        • EXTRACT FROM THE FINAL PLEA FOR DEFENDANT GEBHARDT[161]
    • E. Voluntary Participation of Experimental Subjects
      • a. Introduction
        • b. Selection from the Argumentation of the Prosecution
        • EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING STATEMENT OF THE PROSECUTION[162]
        • c. Selections from the Argumentation of the Defense
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT KARL BRANDT
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE FINAL PLEA FOR DEFENDANT RUFF[164]
        • d. Evidence
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF PROSECUTION WITNESS EUGEN KOGON[165]
        • EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF PROSECUTION EXPERT WITNESS DR. ANDREW C. IVY[166]
      No comment for this book yet, be the first to comment
      You May Also Like
      Also Available On
      Categories
      Curated Lists