The University of the West Indies Press
Caribbean Journal of Mixed Methods Research Volume 2 Issue 1 Article 9
Dr Loraine D. Cook
Caribbean Journal of Mixed Methods Research Volume 2 Issue 1 Article 9
Free
The publisher has enabled DRM protection, which means that you need to use the BookFusion iOS, Android or Web app to read this eBook. This eBook cannot be used outside of the BookFusion platform.
Description
Contents
Reviews

Agency: Students Assuming Ownership of Their Learning in a Foundation Writing Course Designed for Science and Technology and Medical Sciences Majors
by Carmeneta Jones and Jasmin Lawrence


Although foundation writing courses are mandatory for students pursuing studies at a tertiary-level institution in Jamaica, it is not unusual for administrators and facilitators to hear at student–staff liaison meetings and in other contexts that some Science majors think they should be exempt from the course that was designed for them. Some of these students believe that they do not need writing to complete their degrees. However, this is against their better judgement. Science students, like their counterparts in other faculties, need to develop mastery in the application of composite critical literacy skills: interpretive reading, good writing, analytical viewing, informed speaking, active listening and critical thinking referred to sometimes as academic literacies. It is incumbent on Science students to assume responsibility for their learning. Grounded in metacognitive theory and principles of self-monitoring, self-regulated learning, student ownership, student-centred learning and student engagement, the purpose of this semester long mixed methods case study was to discover if the participants’ application of agentic strategies would yield positive outcomes. Data were collected from the participants’ initial and final reflections, observations, group and individual conversations, researchers’ anecdotal notes and questionnaires. During the study, the majority of the students identified and owned concerns they experienced with critical reading and writing. Recognising that these difficulties could create barriers to their attainment of success in their tertiary-level education and careers, the majority committed to purposefully engaging in the course. The findings indicate that though complex, the agentic approach to critical reading and writing instruction at the tertiary level can yield positive outcome if students meaningfully engage with their peers and instructors and are taught how to reflect and implement self-monitoring and related agentic strategies.

Language
English
ISBN
Unknown
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
The book hasn't received reviews yet.