What Do We Know About the World? Rhetorical and Argumentative Perspectives
Gabrijela Kišiček
What Do We Know About the World? Rhetorical and Argumentative Perspectives
Free
Description
Contents
Reviews

What do we know about the world? Rhetorical and Argumentative Perspectives is a book trying to answer the title question by contributing to rhetorical and argumentative studies. It consists of papers presented at the “First International Conference on Rhetoric in Croatia: the Days of Ivo Škarić” in May, 2012, and subsequently revised for publication. Through a variety of different routs, the papers explore the role of rhetoric and argumentation in various types of public discourse and present interdisciplinary work connecting linguists, phoneticians, philosophers, law experts and communication scientists in the common ground of rhetoric and argumentation.. The Conference was organized with the intent of paying respect to the Croatian rhetorician and professor emeritus Ivo Škarić who was the first to introduce rhetoric at the Department of Phonetics at the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zagreb.

Language
English
ISBN
Unknown
PREFACE.. 1
PROLOGUE.. 3
Gordana Varošanec-Škarić, University of Zagreb
Leo Groarke, University of Windsor
I. THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES. 5
Igor Ž. Žagar, Educational Research Institute & University of Primorska
The Elements of Argument: Six Steps To A Thick Theory. 6
Paul Danler, University of Innsbruck
Ana Dimiškovska, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje
Argumentation as poliphony: one speaker, several voices. 29
Fabrizio Macagno, Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Intolerance and the Zero Tolerance Fallacy. 143
The linguistic-discursive creation of the speaker’s ethos for the sake of persuasion: a key aspect o
Sheldon Wein, Saint Mary’s University
Hans V. Hansen, University of Windsor
The Sokal affair and beyond: on the strategic use of parody in the “science wars”. 84
Agnieszka Kampka, Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW
Gabrijela Kišiček, University of Zagreb
The acts and strategies of defining. 115
Language of Politicians vs. Ethos, Pathos and Logos. 234
Joanna Szczepańska-Włoch, Jagiellonian University
Alma Vančura, University of Osijek & Diana Tomić, University of Zagreb
Argumentation and Rhetoric in Legal Decisions. 294
II POLITICAL DISCOURSE.. 162
Maurizio Manzin, Research Centre on Legal Methodology (CERMEG), University of Trento
Political Discourse and Argumentation Profiles. 163
IV. EDUCATION.. 320
Manuele De Conti, University of Padua
Rhetoric of the Crisis. Polish parliamentarian debates on the future of the EU.. 178
Fotini Egglezou, Athens
Petra Aczél, Corvinus University of Budapest
The Political Discourse on Croatia’s EU Accession: a Rhetorical Analysis of the Presentation of the
Ana Grgić & Davor Nikolić, University of Zagreb
Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati & Chiara Pollaroli, University of Lugano
Rhetoric ― Martial Art or the Art of Winning the Soul by Discourse?
Anita Runjić-Stoilova & Josip Galić, University of Split
INDEX.. 488
[1]
The Analysis of Insulting Practices - Sticks and Stones in the Croatian Parliament 262
[2]
III. LEGAL DISCOURSE.. 293
Taking Judges Seriously. 294
Debate as an Educational Tool: Is Polarization a Debate side effect?. 321
Teaching the writing of argumentative genre through imitatio: A solid basis for the ‘beginner’ write
V. MEDIA.. 384
Challenges of Rhetoric in the Era of ‘Bytes and Likes’ 385
The Cowboys, the Poets, the Professor... – Antonomasia in Croatian Sports Discourse. 408
Stakeholders in promotional genres. A rhetorical perspective on marketing communication. 429
The Representation and Reception of Paraphrase in Newspaper Headlines. 458
ABOUT THE AUTHORS. 483
The book hasn't received reviews yet.