Literary Coteries and the Making of Modern Print Culture
Betty Schellenberg
Literature & Fiction
Literary Coteries and the Making of Modern Print Culture
Free
Description
Contents
Reviews

Literary Coteries and the Making of Modern Print Culture, 1740-1790 offers the first study of manuscript-producing coteries as an integral element of eighteenth-century Britain’s literary culture. As a corrective to literary histories assuming that the dominance of print meant the demise of a vital scribal culture, the book profiles four interrelated and influential coteries, focusing on each group’s deployment of traditional scribal practices, on key individuals who served as bridges between networks, and on the aesthetic and cultural work performed by the group. Literary Coteries also explores points of intersection between coteries and the print trade, whether in the form of individuals who straddled the two cultures; publishing events in which the two media regimes collaborated or came into conflict; literary conventions adapted from manuscript practice to serve the ends of print; or simply poetry hand-copied from magazines. Together, these instances demonstrate how scribal modes shaped modern literary production.

Language
English
ISBN
9781316423202
Cover
Half-title page
Title page
Copyright page
Contents
Figures
Tables
Acknowledgments
Abbreviations
Introduction: The literary coterie in the eighteenth-century media landscape
Chapter 1 Wrest Park and North End: Two mid-century coteries
Chapter 2 Formation, fame, and patronage: The Montagu–Lyttelton coterie
Chapter 3 Identity and influence from coterie to print: Carter, Chapone, and the Shenstone–Dodsley collaboration
Chapter 4 Memorializing a coterie life in print: The case of William Shenstone
Chapter 5 “This new species of mischief”: Montagu, Johnson, and the quarrel over character
Chapter 6 Transmediations: Marketing the coterie traveler
Chapter 7 Literary sociability in the eighteenth-century personal miscellany
Conclusion
Notes
Bibliography
Index
The book hasn't received reviews yet.