Patterns of Information Law: Intellectual Property Done Right
James Grimmelmann
Law
Patterns of Information Law: Intellectual Property Done Right
Free
Description
Contents
Reviews

Patterns of Information Law is the coursepack assembled for a fall 2016 intellectual property survey at Cornell Tech. (It draws heavily on materials used in prior semesters at the University of Maryland and at New York Law School.) 

Please see the Introduction for a detailed explanation of what this book is about. In brief, here are the authors' commitments:


  • Intellectual property consists of private rights to prevent other people from using information.

  • The author has tried to include a much wider range of IP fields and related areas than is typical, with coverage including undeveloped ideas, trade secrets, privacy law, government classification, FOIA, utility patents, copyright, state-law copyright for pre-1972 sound recordings, anti-bootlegging, trademark, unfair competition, business names, ticker symbols, stage names, false advertising, geographic indications, rights of publicity, moral rights, personal names, defamation, design, architecture copyright, design patent, semiconductor mask works, vessel hulls, fashion, software, biotechnology, plant patents, plant variety protections, and FDA control over drug approval and marketing.

  • A highly standardized structure has been imposed on most bodies of IP law, dividing them into subject matter, ownership, procedures, similarity, prohibited conduct, and defenses — and with further standardized subdivisions within each of these topics. It is hoped that this brings clarity to the internal worksing of IP fields and facilitates their comparative study.

  • The author has ruthlessly edited down most of the cases, and ignored editorial conventions that get in the way of readability. Procedural postures, citations, and frequently even facts and holdings have been removed. Material within cases has also freely reordered and most of the usual editorial apparatus of brackets and ellipses has been dropped. These are teaching materials, not a legal brief. If it matters what the original says, consult the original.

  • The book is formatted with numerous illustrations, heavy use of color, and extensive marginalia. Almost all citations are removed to the margin, along with other material that would be distracting if included in the main text.

If you disagree with these choices, this probably isn’t the book for you. Whatever utility, however slight, you find in these pages will make the author happy.

Be warned that this casebook is being provided as-is. It contains numerous formatting errors — and probably contains numerous substantive errors. 

James Grimmelmann is a law professor at Cornell Tech and Cornell Law School. He studirs how laws regulating software affect freedom, wealth, and power and tries to help lawyers and technologists understand each other by writing about digital copyright, search engines, privacy on social networks, online governance, and other topics in computer and Internet law.

Language
English
ISBN
Unknown
Introduction
Undeveloped Ideas
Desny v. Wilder
Michael J. Burstein, Exchanging Information Without Intellectual Property
Apfel v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.
Bizarro World Problem
Debt Collection Problem
Trade Secret
Subject Matter
Restatement (Third) of Unfair Competition § 39
Religious Technology Center v. Netcom On-Line Communications Services, Inc.
Ownership
UTSA § 1(4)
Actual Secrecy
United States v. Lange
Learning Curve Toys, Inc. v. PlayWood Toys, Inc.
Exploits Problem
Priority
Collaborations
Restatement (Third) of Unfair Competition § 42 cmt. e
Procedures
United States v. Lange
Rockwell Graphic Systems, Inc. v. DEV Industries, Inc.
Infringement: Similarity
Big Vision Private, Ltd. v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co.
Infringement: Prohibited Conduct
Proving Infringement
Grynberg v. BP, PLC
Direct Infringement
Restatement (Third) of Unfair Competitition § 43
UTSA § 1(1)
E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Christopher
Kamin v. Kuhnau
Secondary Infringement
UTSA § 1(2)
Defenses
Questions
Flaming Moe’s Problem
Locksmiths Problem
Privacy
Restatement (Second) of Torts § 652B
Neil M. Richards & Daniel J. Solove, Privacy's Other Path: Recovering the Law of Confidentiality
Florida v. Riley
Kyllo v. United States
Government Secrets
Freedom of Information Act
U.S. Dept. of Justice v. Tax Analysts
Chrysler Corp. v. Brown
Coastal States Gas Corp. v. Department of Energy
Congressional Research Service, The Protection of Classified Information: The Legal Framework
Phillippi v. Central Intelligence Agency
Patent
United States Constitution, art. I, § 8, cl. 8
Subject Matter
Patent Act § 101
Utility
Juicy Whip, Inc. v. Orange Bang, Inc.
MPEP §§ 2701, 2701.01
Statutory Subject Matter
Tun-Jen Chiang, The Rules and Standards of Patentable Subject Matter
Mayo Collaborative v. Prometheus Labs
Tax Planning Patent Problem
Procedures
Claims
Patent Act § 112(b)-(d)
Indefiniteness
Nautlius, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments Inc.
Freeny v. Apple Inc.
Datamize, LLC v. Plumtree Software, Inc.
Claim Drafting
Catalina Marketing Intern. v. Coolsavings.com
MPEP §§ 2111, 2173
Disclosure
Patent Act § 112(a)
Enablement
O'Reilly v. Morse
Wyeth & Cordis Corp. v. Abbott Labs.
Plastic Dye Problem
Written Description
Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Co
Best Mode
MPEP § 2165
Salt Shaker Problem
Patent Prosecution
Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. Lee
Patent Act § 122
37 C.F.R. pt 1
Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.
Priority Dates
USPTO, General Information Concerning Patents
Multiple Applications
Patent Act § 121
MPEP §§ 201.07
Judicial Review
Post-Grant Proceedings
Patent Act § 121
Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. Lee
Term
Patent Act § 135(a)(2)
Ownership
Collaborations
MPEP § 2137.01
Patent Act § 135
Priority: Novelty and Statutory Bars
Categories of Prior Art
"patented"
"described in a printed publication"
In re Klopfenstein
"in public use"
Mark A. Lemley, Does “Public Use” Mean the Same Thing It Did Last Year?
Egbert v. Lippmann
Lough v. Brunswick Corp
"on sale"
MPEP §§ 2152.02(d), 2133.03(b) & (c)
"otherwise available to the public"
Anticipation
MPEP § 2131
Titanium Metals Corp. of America v. Banner
Priority
Old § 102
MPEP § 2138
Morway v. Bondi
New § 102
Patent Act § 102
Questions
Pleistocene Park Problem
Nonobviousness
Patent Act § 103
KSR Intern. Co. v. Teleflex Inc.
In re Clay
KSR Problem
Infringement: Similarity
Jeanne C. Fromer, Claiming Intellectual Property
N.D. Cal. Model Patent Jury Instructions
Claim Construction
Phillips v. AWH Corp.
Thorner v. Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC
Literal Infringement
Angelo Mongiello's Children, LLC v. Pizza Hut, Inc.
Doctrine of Equivalents
Freedman Seating Co. v. American Seating Co.
Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.
Johnson & Johnston Associates v. R.E. Service Co.
A Hybrid: Means-Plus-Function Claims
Kemco Sales, Inc. v. Control Papers Co., Inc.
Super Soaker Problem
Infringement: Prohibited Conduct
Herman v. Youngstown Car Mfg. Co.
Direct Infringement
Patent Act § 271(a)
Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc.
Indirect Infringement
Patent Act § 271(b)-(c)
Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Technologies, Inc.
Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S.A.
Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Systems Inc.
Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.
Questions
Defenses
Invalidity
Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership
Exhaustion
Aktiebolag v. E.J. Co.
Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc.
Lexmark Intern., Inc. v. Impression Products, Inc.
Miscellaneous
Patent Act §§ 273, 287
Madey v. Duke University
Copyright
Subject Matter
Copyright Act § 102(a)
Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.
Creativity: How Much Is a Modicum?
37 C.F.R. § 202.1(a)
Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.
Arrows Problem
Baseball Card Price Report Problem
Aesthetic Nondiscrimination
Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co.
Copyright Compendium § 310
Mitchell Bros. Film Group v. Cinema Adult Theater
Belcher v. Tarbox
Idea and Expression
Copyright Act § 102(b)
Blehm v. Jacobs
Walker v. Time Life Films, Inc.
Hula Problem
Baker v. Selden
Bikram's Yoga College of India v. Evolation Yoga
Concrete Machinery Co. v. Classic Lawn Ornaments
Cooking for Kids Problem
Ownership
Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp.
Authorship
Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony
Monkey Selfie Problem
Copyright Act § 105
Collaborations
Copyright Act §§ 201, 202
Thomson v. Larson
Greene v. Ablon
Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid
Garcia v. Google, Inc.
Derivative Works
Copyright Act § 103
DC Comics v. Towle
Pickett v. Prince
Keeling v. Hars
Procedures
Formalities Then
Christopher Sprigman, Reform(aliz)ing Copyright
Estate of Martin Luther King v. CBS, Inc.
Estate of Martin Luther King v. CBS, Inc.
Wildman v. New York Times Co.
Formalities Now
Fixation
Copyright Compendium § 305
Stern Electronics, Inc. v. Kaufman
Questions
Photoshoot Problem
Registration
Copyright Compendium § 202
Deposit
Copyright Compendium §§ 1502, 1511
Notice
Copyright Compendium §§ 2202, 2204
Term
Copyright Act §§ 302, 305
Eldred v. Ashcroft
Klinger v. Conan Doyle Estate
Infringement: Similarity
Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp.
Nichols v. Universal Pictures Corporation
Arnstein v. Porter
Children’s Book Problem
Gottlieb Development LLC v. Paramount Pictures
Boisson v. Banian, Ltd.
New Yorker Problem
Infringement: Prohibited Conduct
Proof of Copying
Three Boys Music Corp. v. Bolton
Bee Gees Problem
Direct Infringement
Copyright Act § 106
Capitol Records, LLC v. ReDigi Inc.
CoStar Group, Inc. v. LoopNet, Inc.
American Broadcasting v. Aereo, Inc.
Copyright Act § 110
Secondary Liability
Fonovisa, Inc. v. Cherry Auction, Inc.
Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.
Exclusive Rights Problem
Paracopyright
Copyright Act § 1201
MDY Industries, LLC. v. Blizzard Entertainment, Inc.
Copyright Act § 1202
Murphy v. Millennium Radio Group LLC
Defenses
First Sale
Copyright Act § 109
UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Augusto
Capitol Records, LLC v. ReDigi Inc.
Fair Use
Copyright Act § 107
Fair Use Checklist
Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises
Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.
City of Inglewood v. Teixeira
Fox Broadcasting Co., Inc. v. Dish Network LLC
Capitol Records, LLC v. ReDigi Inc.
Chicago HOPE Problem
Section 512
Copyright Act § 512
UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Shelter Capital Partners
Statutory Licenses
WPIX, Inc. v. ivi, Inc.
Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. AereoKiller
Miscellaneous
Copyright Act §§ 108, 121
Music
Steve Albini, The Problem with Music
Musical Works and Sound Recordings
Robert Brauneis, Musical Work Copyright for the Era of Digital Sound Technology
White-Smith Music Publishing Co. v. Apollo Co.
Copyright Office, Federal Copyright Protection for Pre-1972 Sound Recordings
Copyright Act §§ 101, 102
Lydia Pallas Loren, Untangling the Web of Music Copyrights
Newton v. Diamond
Reproductions
Musical Works
Copyright Act § 115(a)
37 C.F.R. pt. 385
Lydia Pallas Loren, Untangling the Web of Music Copyrights
Leadsinger, Inc. v. BMG Music Pub.
Sound Recordings
Copyright Act § 114(b)
Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Dimension Films
VMG Salsoul, LLC v. Ciccone
Performances
United States v. American Society of Composers, Authors, and Publishers
Musical Works
Broadcasting and Receiving
Buck v. Jewell-LaSalle Realty Co.
Copyright Act § 110(5)
The Performing Rights Organizations
Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.
ASCAP 2010 Radio Station License Agreement
Range Road Music, Inc. v. East Coast Foods, Inc.
Robert Stigwood Grp., Ltd. v. Sperber
Miscellaneous
Copyright Act § 116
History of the Jukebox License Office
Copyright Act § 110
Sound Recordings
Copyright Act § 114
Copyright Office, Copyright and the Music Marketplace
State-Law Protection for Pre-1972 Sound Recordings
Copyright Act §§ 301(c)
RCA Mfg. Co. v. Whiteman
Copyright Office, Federal Copyright Protection for Pre-1972 Sound Recordings
Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. Sirius XM Radio, Inc.
Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. Sirius XM Radio, Inc.
UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Escape Media Group, Inc.
Capitol Records, LLC v. Vimeo, LLC
Bootlegging
Metropolitan Opera Assoc. v. Wagner-Nichols Recorder Corp.
Copyright Act § 1101(a)
United States v. Martignon
Questions
Trademark
The Trade-Mark Cases
Subject Matter
Lanham Act § 45 (“trademark”)
Drug Stamps Problem
Word Marks
Zatarains, Inc. v. Oak Grove Smokehouse, Inc.
Innovation Ventures, LLC v. N.V.E., Inc.
TMEP § 1202
Elliot v. Google Inc.
TMEP § 1209.03
Designs
Star Industries, Inc. v. Bacardi & Co. Ltd.
Melting Bad Problem
Ownership
Priority at Common Law
Galt House Inc. v. Home Supply Company
United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.
Planetary Motion, Inc. v. Techsplosion, Inc.
Dudley v. HealthSource Chiropractic, Inc.
CreAgri, Inc. v. USANA Health Sciences, Inc.
Bilgewater Bill’s Problem
Federal Registration
Registration
Lanham Act §§ 1(a), 7
Burger King of Florida, Inc. v. Hoots
Bilgewater Bill's Problem, Redux
Intent-to-Use Applications
Lanham Act § 1(b)
Kelly Services, Inc. v. Creative Harbor, LLC [I]
Kelly Services, Inc. v. Creative Harbor, LLC [II]
Bilgewater Bill’s Problem, Re-Redux
Collaborations
Boogie Kings v. Guillory
TMEP § 1201.03
Duff Problem
Procedures
Registration
Lanham Act § 2(a)
Lanham Act § 2
In re Tam
In re Boulevard Entertainment, Inc.
TMEP §§ 1302–1304
TMEP §§ 904, 1401, 1402
TMEP § 906
Opposition
Lanham Act §§ 2(d), 12, 13
B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc.
B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc.
Maintenance
Lanham Act §§ 8,9
Cancellation and Incontestability
Lanham Act §§ 14, 15
Park ‘N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.
Abandonment
Lanham Act § 45 (“abandoned”)
Procter & Gamble Co. v. Johnson & Johnson Inc.
Trademark Throwback Problem
Infringement: Confusion
Lanham Act § 32
Virgin Enterprises Ltd. v. Nawab
Sally Beauty Co., Inc. v. Beautyco, Inc.
Cheat Sheet Problem
Boats Problem
Infringement: Prohibited Conduct
Threshold Conditions
Rescuecom Corp. v. Google Inc.
Radiance Foundation, Inc. v. NAACP
Theories of Confusion
Reverse Confusion
Restatement (Third) of Unfair Competition § 20 cmt. f
Initial Interest Confusion
Grotrian, Helfferich, Schultz, Th. Steinweg Nachf v. Steinway & Sons
Brookfield Communications v. West Coast Entertainment
Hearts on Fire Company, LLC v. Blue Nile, Inc.
Post-Sale Confusion
General Motors Corp. v. Keystone Automotive Industries, Inc.
Section 43(a)
Lanham Act § 43(a)(1)(A)
Unfair Competition
Margreth Barrett, Finding Trademark Use
William R. Warner & Co. v. Eli Lilly & Co.
Blinded Veterans Association v. Blinded American Veterans Foundation
False Endorsement
Yale Electric Corp. v. Robertson
Conan Properties, Inc. v. Conans Pizza, Inc.
International Order of Job's Daughters v. Lindeburg & Co.
Failure to Attribute
Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp
Dilution
Frank I. Schechter, The Rational Basis of Trademark Protection
Jeremy N. Sheff, The (Boundedly) Rational Basis of Trademark Liability
Ty Inc. v. Perryman
Lanham Act § 43(c)
Nike, Inc. v. Nikepal Intern., Inc.
Dilution Lightning Round
Problems
Ambush Marketing Problem
Jack Daniel’s Problem
Paper Handbag Problem
Secondary Liability
Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.
Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Lee
Defenses
Lanham Act § 43(c)(3)
Descriptive Fair Use
Zatarains, Inc. v. Oak Grove Smokehouse, Inc.
Nominative Fair Use
New Kids on the Block v. New America Pub., Inc.
Smith v. Chanel, Inc.
Exhaustion
Champion Spark Plug Co. v. Sanders
Hart v. Amazon.com, Inc.
Expressive Use
Louis Vuitton Malletier v. Haute Diggity Dog
Louis Vuitton Mallatier v. Warner Bros.
Miscellaneous
Lanham Act § 32(2)
Trademark Defenses Lightning Round
Other Identifier Registries
Phone Numbers
Holiday Inns, Inc. v. 800 Reservation, Inc.
Radio Callsigns
In re WSM, Inc.
Business Names
Model Business Corporation Act
Harvard Business Services v. Coyle
Cooper v. Goodman
Friedman v. Rogers
Ticker Symbols
Eric Levenson, Investors Buy Up Worthless Stock After Confusing It for an Actual Successful Company
FINRA Uniform Practice Advisory # 39 -13
Central Parking Corp. v. Park One Inc.
Exxon Corp. v. Xoil Energy Resources, Inc.
MDT Corp. v. New York Stock Exchange, Inc.
Comments of James Angel on General Portability Filing
ISBNs
ISBN.org, FAQs: General Questions
License Plates
Wooley v. Maynard
Mitchell v. Maryland Motor Vehicle Administration
Nevada Administrative Code § 482.320
Domain Names
Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act
Uniform Domain-Name Dispute Resolution Policy
Online Accounts
Twitter Rules
Stage Names
Professional Name Policy
David Fagundes, Talk Derby to Me: Intellectual Property Norms Governing Roller Derby Pseudonyms
Advertising
False Advertising
Lanham Act § 43(a)(1)(B)
"Ownership": Competitor Standing
American Washboard Co. v. Saginaw Mfg. Co.
Ely-Norris Safe Co. v. Mosler Safe Co.
Mosler Safe Co. v. Ely-Norris Safe Co.
Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.
"Infringement": Prohibited Conduct
Greater Houston Transportation Company v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Procter & Gamble Co. v. Haugen
"Infringement": Falsity and Materiality
Pizza Hut, Inc. v. Papa John’s Intern., Inc.
McNeil-PPC, Inc. v. Pfizer Inc.
Satellite TV Problem
Secondary Liability
Duty Free Americas, Inc. v. Estee Lauder Companies, Inc.
Alternatives to Competitor Suits
Commercial Disparagement and Related Torts
HipSaver, Inc. v. Kiel
Aviation Charter, Inc. v. Aviation Research
Consumer Suits
Perrine v. Sega of America, Inc.
FTC Enforcement
Federal Trade Commission v. Winsted Hosiery Company
Kraft, Inc. v. FTC
Letter from Federal Trade Commission to Microsoft Corp. and Starcom MediaVest Group
Other Sources of Advertising Law
Trademark
Lanham Act §§ 2(e)(1), (f)
In re Budge Mfg. Co.
Certifications
Lanham Act § 45 (“certification mark”)
TMEP § 1306
Fair Trade USA Farm Workers Standard
Understanding the FCC Regulations for Low-Power, Non-Licensed Transmitter
Inspection & Grading of Meat and Poultry: What Are the Differences?
Geographic Indications
Justin Hughes, Champagne, Feta, and Bourbon – The Spirited Debate About Geographical Indications
TRIPS arts. 22–24
Lanham Act § 2
Guantanamera Cigar Co. v. Corporacion Habanos
Labeling and Advertising of Distilled Spirits, 27 C.F.R Part 5
Textile Products Identification Act
Melting Bad Problem, Redux
Regulation
POM Wonderful LLC v. The Coca-Cola Company
Rebecca Tushnet, It Depends on What the Meaning of "False" is: Falsity and Misleadingness in Commercial Speech Doctrine
Commack Self-Service Kosher Meats, Inc. v. Weiss
Levy v. Kosher Overseers Ass'n of America, Inc.
Mandatory Disclosures
American Meat Institute v. Dept. of Agriculture
National Ass'n of Mfrs. v. Securities and Exchange Commission [I]
National Ass'n of Mfrs. v. Securities and Exchange Commission [II]
Self-Regulation
Mead Johnson Nutritionals (Enfamil LIPIL)
CARU Press Release
Problems
Scavenger Hunt Problem
problems/fortunetelling
Personality Rights
Right of Publicity
Ownership
Privacy Theories
Roberson v. Rochester Folding Box Co.
New York Civil Rights Law § 51
Pavesich v. New England Life Ins. Co.
O'Brien v. Pabst Sales Co.
Property Theories
Haelan Laboratories v. Topps Chewing Gum
Joseph R. Grodin, Note: The Right of Publicity: A Doctrinal Innovation
Fraley v. Facebook, Inc.
Subject Matter
Midler v. Ford Motor Co.
White v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
White v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Procedures
Hebrew University of Jerusalem v. General Motors
Infringement: Similarity
Hooker v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.
Infringement: Prohibited Conduct
Direct Infringement
Stephano v. News Group Publications, Inc.
Washington v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.
Secondary Liability
Perfect 10, Inc. v. Cybernet Ventures, Inc.
Defenses
Allison v. Vintage Sports Plaques
Rosa and Raymond Parks Institute for Self Development v. Target Corp.
No Doubt v. Activision Publishing, Inc.
Problems
Governator Problem
Tony Twist Problem
Moral Rights
Peter Baldwin, The Copyright Wars: Three Centuries of Trans-Atlantic Battle
Roberta Rosenthal Kwall, Copyright and the Moral Right: Is an American Marriage Possible?
Berne Convention art. 6bis
Copyright Act § 106A
Integrity
Massachusetts Museum of Contemporary Art Foundation v. Büchel
Philips v. Pembroke Real Estate, Inc.
Clean Flicks of Colorado, LLC v. Soderbergh
Prepared Statement of Taylor Hackford on Behalf of the Directors Guild of America
Attribution
Williams v. UMG Recordings, Inc.
Catherine L. Fisk, Credit Where It's Due: The Law and Norms of Attribution
People as Trademarks
Lanham Act §§ 2(c), (d)(4)
Peaceable Planet, Inc. v. Ty, Inc.
David B. Findlay, Inc. v. Findlay
Hebrew University of Jerusalem v. General Motors LLC
Brown v. Electronic Arts, Inc.
Melting Bad Problem, Re-Redux
Personal Names
Laura A. Heymann, Naming, Identity, and Trademark Law
Carlton F.W. Larson, Naming Baby: The Constitutional Dimensions of Parental Naming Rights
In re Mokiligon
Petition of Variable
In re Ravitch
In re Serpentfoot
Weingand v. Lorre
Application of Clark
In re Name Change of Handley
In re Porter
Defamation and False Light
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.
Restatement (Second) of Torts § 652E
Tyne ex rel. Tyne v. Time Warner Entertainment Co., L.P.
Restatement (Second) of Torts § 564 cmt. d
Jessica Litman, Information Privacy/Information Property
Design
Patent
Copyright
Useful Articles
Mazer v. Stein
Copyright Act § 101 ("useful article")
H.R. Rep No. 94-1476
Brandir Intern., Inc. v. Cascade Pacific Lumber Co.
Eames Chair Problem
Copyright Act § 113
Report of the Register of Copyrights on the General Revision of the Copyright Law (1961)
Model Car Problem
Architecture
Kevin Emerson Collins, Economically Defeasible Rights to Facilitate Information Disclosure: The Hidden Wisdom of Pre-AWCPA Copyright
Copyright Act § 120
37 C.F.R. § 202.11
Intervest Construction., Inc. v. Canterbury Estate Homes
Zalewski v. Cicero Builder Dev., Inc.
Embassy Problem
Moral Rights
Cheffins v. Stewart
Trademark
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Brothers, Inc.
Lanham Act §§ 2(e)(5), 43(a)(3)
TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc.
In re Florists' Transworld Delivery, Inc.
Maker's Mark Distillery, Inc. v. Diageo North America, Inc.
Eames Chair Problem, Revisited
Pez Dispenser Problem
Design Patent
Patent Act §§ 171, 173
Subject Matter
Articles of Manufacture
In re Hruby
In re AlSabah
Ornamentality
In re Webb
Rosco, Inc. v. Mirror Lite Co.
In re Koehring
Procedures
MPEP § 1503
Patent Act § 173
Ownership
Novelty
International Seaway Trading Corp. v. Walgreens Corp.
Obviousness
MRC Innovations, Inc. v. Hunter Mfg., LLP,
Infringement: Similarity
Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc.
Wing Shing Products (BVI) Co. v. Sunbeam Products, Inc.
OddzOn Products, Inc. v. Just Toys, Inc.
L.A. Gear, Inc. v. Thom McAn Shoe Co.
Infringement: Prohibited Conduct
Patent Act § 289
Milo & Gabby, LLC v. Amazon.com
Defenses
Jazz Photo Corp. v. International Trade Com'n
Ralph D. Clifford & Richard J. Peltz-Steele, The Constitutionality of Design Patents
Eames Chair Problem, Re-revisited
Sui Generis Regimes
Semiconductor Masks
Pamela Samuelson, Creating a New Kind of Intellectual Property: Applying the Lessons of the Chip Law to Computer Programs
Kal Raustiala & Christopher Sprigman, The Piracy Paradox, Innovation and Intellectual Property in Fashion Design
Altera Corp. v. Clear Logic, Inc.
Vessel Hulls
Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.
Copyright Act ch. 13
Maverick Boat Co., Inc. v. American Marine Holdings, Inc.
Fashion
Copyright
Jack Adelman, Inc. v. Sonners & Gordon, Inc.
Cheney Bros. v. Doris Silk Corporation
Fashion Originators' Guild of America v. Federal Trade Commission
Peter Pan Fabrics, Inc. v. Brenda Fabrics, Inc.
Varsity Brands, Inc. v. Star Athletica, LLC
Trademark
Christian Louboutin v. Yves Saint Laurent America
Christian Louboutin v. Yves Saint Laurent America
Design Patent
Kal Raustiala & Christopher Sprigman, The Piracy Paradox, Innovation and Intellectual Property in Fashion Design
Sui Generis Protection?
James Surowiecki, The Piracy Paradox
C. Scott Hemphill & Jeannie Suk, The Law, Culture, and Economics of Fashion
Innovative Design Protection Act of 2012
Software
Trade Secret
Barr-Mullin, Inc. v. Browning
Silvaco Data Systems v. Intel Corp.
Patent
Subject Matter
Then
In re Bernhart
In re Alappat
State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group
Now
Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int'l
McRO, Inc. v. Bandai Namco Games America Inc.
Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corp.
Procedures
Williamson v. Citrix Online, LLC
Mark A. Lemley, Software Patents and the Return of Functional Claiming
Obviousness
Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Copyright
Subject Matter
Apple Computer, Inc. v. Franklin Computer Corp.
Adobe Systems Inc. v. Southern Software Inc.
Whelan Associates, Inc. v. Jaslow Dental Laboratory, Inc.
Computer Associates Intern., Inc. v. Altai, Inc.
Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.
Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.
Tetris Problem
Defenses
Copyright Act § 117
Sega Enterprises Ltd. v. Accolade, Inc.
Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Corley
Trademark
Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Design Patent
Michael Risch, Functionality and Graphical User Interface Design Patents
Smartphone Problem
Biotechnology
Patent
Subject Matter
Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.
In re Roslin Institute (Edinburgh)
Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc.
DNA Copyright Problem
Ownership
Schering Corp. v. Geneva Pharmaceuticals
Eli Lilly and Co. v. Zenith Goldline Pharm. Inc.
Infringement: Similarity
Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc. v. Schering-Plough Corp.
Defenses
Bowman v. Monsanto Co.
Plants
Plant Patents
Imazio Nursery, Inc. v. Dania Greenhouses
Mark D. Janis & Jay P. Kesan, U.S. Plant Variety Protection: Sound and Fury ... ?
Patent Act §§ 161–163
37 CFR § 1.164
Subject Matter
In re Arzberger
Procedures
In re Greer
Ownership
Ex parte Moore
Dunn v. Ragin v. Carlile
In re LeGrice
Yoder Bros., Inc. v. California-Florida Plant Corp.
Infringement
Imazio Nursery, Inc. v. Dania Greenhouses
Armstrong Nurseries, Inc. v. Smith
Plant Variety Protection Act
S. Rep. 91-1246 (1970)
Subject Matter
PVPA § 42
Procedures
PVPA § 52
Genecorp, Inc. v. Progeny Advanced Genetics, Inc.
PVPA § 83
Ownership
PVPA § 42
Defenses
PVPA §§ 44, 112–115
Jim Chen, The Parable of the Seeds
Infringement
PVPA § 111
Delta and Pine Land Co. v. Sinkers Corp.
The Punchline
JEM Ag Supply, Inc. v. Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.
Drug Approval
Patent Issues
Kara B. Swanson, Food and Drug Law as Intellectual Property Law
Merck KGaA v. Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd.
Eli Lilly & Co. v. Medtronic, Inc.
Hatch-Waxman
United States v. Generix Drug Corp.
FTC v. Actavis, Inc.
Actavis Elizabeth LLC v. U.S. Food and Drug Admin.
Erika Lietzan, The Myths of Data Exclusivity
Caraco Pharmaceutical Labs v. Novo Nordisk
FTC v. Actavis, Inc.
Orphan Drugs
Genentech, Inc. v. Bowen
Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Schwetz
Drug Marketing
Names
Note on Drug Naming
S. Rep. 87-448 (1961)
21 C.F.R. § 201.10
Kos Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Andrx Corp.
666 Problem
Design
Shire US Inc. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.
Jeremy A. Greene & Aaron S. Kesselheim, Why Do the Same Drugs Look Different? Pills, Trade Dress, and Public Health
Labeling and Advertising
Consumer-Directed Broadcast Advertisements: Guidance for Industry
Letter from Robert Dean, Division Director, OPDP, FDA, to Eric Gervais
United States v. Caronia
Wyeth v. Levine
PLIVA, Inc. v. Mensing
SmithKline Beecham v. Watson Pharmaceuticals
Bizarro World Redux Problem
The book hasn't received reviews yet.